Harbor Blvd. Bike Trail at night

Costa Mesa’s draft Active Transportation Plan: A summary

Cover of the 2017 transportation plan.[This is the first article in a series on Costa Mesa’s draft Active Transportation Plan.  The next article discusses the proposed Tanager Drive Trail extension and Fairview Park multi-use trails, and the third article discusses the plan’s implications for Orange Coast College.]

The city of Costa Mesa is working on a new active transportation plan. The plan is being drafted by Stantec, with input from city residents, city staff, and the city’s Bikeway and Walkability committee. The most recent version of the plan available online is the August 2017 draft.

The Bikeway and Walkability Committee is currently soliciting public input on the plan, with the second of two public outreach sessions happening Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 7:00pm in conference room 1A at Costa Mesa City Hall.

To help people understand this new plan, which is more than 75 pages long, I’ll try to summarize some of the key elements in this post.

Existing infrastructure

The city currently has 43.5 miles of bike routes, though only nine of those are Class I (off-street) bicycle paths that completely separate cyclists from traffic; most of the rest are bike lanes painted on the edge of roadways.

A map of Costa Mesa, CA showing bike paths.
Map of Costa Mesa’s existing bike facilities, from the August 2017 draft of the Costa Mesa Active Transportation Plan. Red lines are Class I (off-street multi-use trails), blue lines are Class II (bike lanes), and green lines are Class III (bike routes).

Types of bicycle paths

Here’s what the colored lines on that map mean:

Class I: off-street multi-use trail

Person on bike on Class I bike path.
A person on a bike rides along the Harbor Cornerstone Bike Trail in Costa Mesa.

Indicated on the map with red lines, these are pathways that completely separate the people on them from motor vehicle traffic. These are by far the most welcoming to people of all ages and all skill levels, such as children, inexperienced bicyclists, or people with disabilities. Class I trails are not just for cyclists: dog walkers, roller skaters, joggers, kids on scooters, and everyone else can use them too.

The shining star of Class I bicycle paths in Costa Mesa is the Harbor Boulevard Cornerstone Trail, built in 2016, that runs along Harbor between Merrimac and Fair.

Some of the best cycling/walking/recreational areas in the county are anchored by Class I trails: Newport Back Bay, the San Diego Creek Trail, Castaways Park, and more.

Bike trail on cliffs above water.
The trail that leads north out of Castaways Park heads along the cliffs above Newport Back Bay and behind some gorgeous homes. It’s a beautiful example of a Class I trail.
lights illuminate the fog-shrouded bike trail.
A foggy evening on the San Diego Creek Trail in Irvine.

Class II: bike lanes

Cyclist in a bike lane with a car near her.
A cyclist rides in the Class II bike lane on Merrimac by Orange Coast College in Costa Mesa.

Indicated on the map with blue lines, these facilities are what most people think of when they hear “bike lane”: these are (usually) narrow lanes painted near the shoulder of the road. They provide far less protection from cars than Class I facilities, and can be intimidating to use on streets with lots of high-speed motor vehicle traffic.

Bike lane in the door zone
The bike lane on California Street in Costa Mesa places bicyclists directly in the path of opening car doors.

Class II bike paths may be separated from the traffic lanes by many feet of painted open space (e.g., Placentia near Fairview Park), or they may be separated from cars by only a few inches of paint (e.g., Adams).

Class III: bike routes / bike boulevards

Sharrows on a pretty street.
Sharrows painted in the middle of Bayside Drive in Newport Beach indicate that cyclists are encouraged to occupy the center of the lane.  Due to the lack of traffic calming measures, this would be classified as a bicycle route, not a bicycle boulevard.

Indicated on the map with green lines (for bike routes) and purple lines (for bike boulevards), these are typically used on low-traffic-volume streets where there is not room to place any of the other types of bike facility. Instead, for bike routes, the street is signed and painted to indicate that bicyclists may occupy the full lane (often with “sharrows” painted on the pavement, though Costa Mesa has not generally used these yet). Bike boulevards are like bike routes, except that the street is also re-engineered to introduce traffic-calming measures (such as speed humps, medians, extensions of the curb at corners, or traffic circles).

Costa Mesa currently only has two miles of bike routes, which are poorly marked, and no bike boulevards (though I believe the city is currently working on turning some of 19th Street into a bike boulevard).

Class IV: protected bikeways (cycle tracks)

Protected bikeway.
A Class IV protected bikeway in Vancouver, BC. Image by By Paul Krueger (Flickr: Hornby Separated Bike Lane) [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons.
Indicated on the map with yellow lines, this is a newly developed type of bicycle facility; there is none currently in Costa Mesa. Protected bike lanes are essentially traditional bike lanes (Class II facility) with some type of additional physical protection/separation from car traffic lanes, such as concrete dividers, curbs, planters, bollards, etc.

Highlights of Costa Mesa’s current active transportation infrastructure

The Class I trails along Harbor (the Harbor Boulevard Cornerstone Trail and Joann Street Trail) allow people to travel from Merrimac almost all the way to Victoria off-street, with only one street crossing, and the Joann Street trail south of the golf course allows people to travel between Harbor and Placentia safe from car traffic. The Class I trails inside Fairview Park allow cyclists to easily enter and exit the park and the Santa Ana River Trail (allowing bike commuters and recreational cyclists easy access to this great resource). The Class I trail on Victoria allows users to safely traverse the 0.7 miles of the road that it’s present on (the rest of Victoria has a Class II bike lane on it).

Costa Mesa has a large number of bike commuters. Overall, 2.2% of the city residents ride their bikes to work, the highest percentage of bike commuters of any of our local cities, and more than double the county (1.0%) and state (1.1%) averages.

Areas of improvement for Costa Mesa’s active transportation infrastructure

Much of the infrastructure currently in place in Costa Mesa has some problems, including bike lanes that are narrow (placing cyclists at risk of being hit by passing vehicles) or next to parked cars (placing cyclists at risk of being hit by opening car doors), bike paths only on one side of a street, bike lanes that end before intersections (forcing bicyclists to merge into a lane of faster-moving car traffic to continue traveling straight), road sensors that fail to detect bicycles to trigger stoplight changes, and inadequate signage and markings (making it difficult to figure out where to ride).

These problems have likely contributed to a sobering statistic: in 2013 there were 87 collisions with bicyclists resulting in injuries or fatalities, causing Costa Mesa to have the third worst injury/collision rate of 56 similarly sized California cities (data from the California Office of Traffic Safety).

The city as a whole has a problem with interconnectedness: there are many gaps in the cycling infrastructure that give people no bike-specific facilities leading to common destinations.  For instance, Orange Coast College has only two bike paths connecting to it (along Fairview and Merrimac), and they are both Class II bike lanes that end before every intersection. Many of the busiest shopping districts of Costa Mesa (Harbor Boulevard, 17th Street, 19th Street, and Newport Boulevard south of the 55) completely lack cycling infrastructure, and other shopping districts (e.g., South Coast Plaza, Fairview, Baker) have only Class II bike lanes near them, making it difficult for residents to bike to their local businesses.

The active transportation plan notes that the city could use additional support facilities for cyclists, such as bike racks, showers at workplaces, and secure bike parking at transit connections.

Proposed new facilities

The proposal includes plans for 8.7 miles of new Class I paths, 20 miles of new Class II paths, 7.3 miles of new Class II paths, and 7 miles of new Class IV paths.

Map of proposed new and existing bike paths in Costa Mesa.
Map of proposed new (dashed lines) and existing (solid lines) facilities from the August 2017 draft of the Costa Mesa Active Transportation Plan. Red lines are Class I (off-street multi-use trails), blue lines are Class II (bike lanes), green lines are Class III (bike routes), purple lines are Class III (bike boulevards), and yellow lines are Class IV (protected bikeways).

One of the biggest improvements in the new proposal is the amount of connectedness: once all of these facilities are built, it will be far easier for people using active transportation to get where they want to go on routes welcoming to them. For example:

  • Orange Coast College will be surrounded with bike paths, including a protected bikeway along the length of Merrimac and an off-street multi-use trail connecting Merrimac to Adams. Orange Coast College will also be easier to get to from across the city, with a completely protected / off-street pathway leading to Fairview Park and the Santa Ana River Trail (via Tanager Street and Fairview Park), and easy access to off-street multi-use trails leading east along Arlington and the Paularino Channel.
  • The existing bike lanes on Adams Avenue will be upgraded to a protected bikeway, dramatically increasing the safety and utility of that route, which is core to crossing northern Costa Mesa and traveling to/from Huntington Beach.
  • All major shopping areas in the city will have either bike lanes, bike routes, bike boulevards, or protected bikeways adjacent to them, making it much easier for residents to bike to their neighborhood businesses.
  • A new off-street multi-use trail will connect from 19th Street to the Santa Ana River Trail, allowing residents of Westside Costa Mesa to travel to the beach, exercise, and visit parks more easily.
  • The addition of off-street multi-use trails in Fairview Park and on the northern edge of the golf course next to Tanager (on land the city already has rights to) will allow residents of central Costa Mesa (e.g., College Park and eastern Mesa Verde) to access Fairview Park using completely off-street trails, will allow residents to circumnavigate the golf course and Developmental Center nearly completely on off-street paths, and will form part of a completely off-street/protected bikeway link connecting Fairview Park and Newport Back Bay.
  • The Paularino Channel Trail will be an off-street multi-use trail running along an existing right of way next to a flood control channel, allowing people on bikes or on foot to travel from Pinecreek Drive (just next to OCC) all the way to Bristol (near The Lab and The Camp). If extended on existing service roads, it could eventually link up with Newport Back Bay on completely off-street routes.
  • The Airport Channel / Dehli Channel Off-Street Multi-Use Trail would cross the 405 Freeway just east of Bristol, giving walkers and cyclists a much-needed safe crossing of the 405 in eastern Costa Mesa, and allow residents of northeastern Costa Mesa to easily access the South Coast Plaza region. It would also allow cycle commuters to travel between Santa Ana and Costa Mesa with ease, especially once connected to the Paularino Channel trail.

Conclusion

Speaking personally, I’m excited about the draft plan. If implemented, the changes discussed would make it dramatically easier and safer for residents of Costa Mesa to walk, bike, skate, or scoot wherever they need to go. And, as a result, this plan should reduce traffic congestion.

Whether you’re thinking about getting to school, exercising, commuting to work, running errands, heading to a coffee shop, going for a joy ride, or just spending family time together, this plan has something for nearly everyone.

Read the plan itself

But don’t trust me; head over to the Costa Mesa Bikeway and Walkability Committee page and read the plan for yourself.

To help you orient yourself, here’s an outline of the plan’s chapters:

  1. Introduction
  2. Related planning initiatives: Goes over Orange County’s cycling master plan and the cycling infrastructure of neighboring cities before talking about Costa Mesa’s current plan.
  3. Components of bicycle planning: Discusses different types of bike paths and other elements of urban planning related to cycling.
  4. Existing conditions analysis: A detailed evaluation of Costa Mesa’s existing bicycle facilities, discussing each bike lane individually, with some key routes (such as Adams) discussed in great depth.
  5. Policy framework: Details the goals, objectives, policies, and recommendations related to active transportation that the city will formally adopt.
  6. Recommendations for the future: Describes all of the proposed new cycling facilities throughout the city, sorted by type of path.
  7. Implementation strategy: Looks at the predicted cost of the various proposals (sorted by type of path) and discusses funding sources.

2 thoughts on “Costa Mesa’s draft Active Transportation Plan: A summary

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *